<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of reading&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danutakean.com/blog/the-future-of-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danutakean.com/blog/the-future-of-reading/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 09:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Guerin</title>
		<link>http://www.danutakean.com/blog/the-future-of-reading/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Guerin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danutakean.com/blog/?p=233#comment-323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to Anne&#039;s comment, I think it would be fairer to say that technological trends driven by fashion are always taken up by younger people first. New technologies in general are taken up by the curious, and they occur at all stages in the life-cycle. 

I think Danuta hits on a few very good points: one is that it is very hard to say that ereaders will explode along the same lines as the ipod, and secondly that the ebook format offers too much to not catch on.

It&#039;s not just a matter of age that leaves her unsure of the technology&#039;s future. I&#039;m a student in his early 20&#039;s, and I don&#039;t know if a reading device will be able to embody a &quot;mass-market coolness&quot; in the way that the ipod has. Why? Because music is simply different to reading. I find it hard to picture an advertising campaign based on an ereader with the same impact of Apple&#039;s dancing silhouettes in the ipod advert. Literature is something that it&#039;s fans tend to enjoy due to its exclusivity.  Of course I could be proved wrong...

My contemporaries and I are so used to the convenience of researching online that I&#039;m sure a site selling electronic academic texts would make a killing. I&#039;m sick of walking up to the library only to find that it&#039;s closed due to a Bank Holiday, or that I haven&#039;t got time to queue for the photocopier cos it&#039;s nearly 7 pm. Both of these problems: access and distribution would not effect an e-book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Anne&#8217;s comment, I think it would be fairer to say that technological trends driven by fashion are always taken up by younger people first. New technologies in general are taken up by the curious, and they occur at all stages in the life-cycle. </p>
<p>I think Danuta hits on a few very good points: one is that it is very hard to say that ereaders will explode along the same lines as the ipod, and secondly that the ebook format offers too much to not catch on.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just a matter of age that leaves her unsure of the technology&#8217;s future. I&#8217;m a student in his early 20&#8242;s, and I don&#8217;t know if a reading device will be able to embody a &#8220;mass-market coolness&#8221; in the way that the ipod has. Why? Because music is simply different to reading. I find it hard to picture an advertising campaign based on an ereader with the same impact of Apple&#8217;s dancing silhouettes in the ipod advert. Literature is something that it&#8217;s fans tend to enjoy due to its exclusivity.  Of course I could be proved wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>My contemporaries and I are so used to the convenience of researching online that I&#8217;m sure a site selling electronic academic texts would make a killing. I&#8217;m sick of walking up to the library only to find that it&#8217;s closed due to a Bank Holiday, or that I haven&#8217;t got time to queue for the photocopier cos it&#8217;s nearly 7 pm. Both of these problems: access and distribution would not effect an e-book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Holland</title>
		<link>http://www.danutakean.com/blog/the-future-of-reading/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danutakean.com/blog/?p=233#comment-322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following extract from &#039;books at Auction&#039; probably won&#039;t come out with the correct line-breaks, but it&#039;s part of a long poem I wrote about the survival of the book. Personally I think the book WILL survive in its current form, if only because so many people are ardent fans of the book and specialist collectors of the same. Also, technology is not stable enough at the moment to make a complete transfer to that medium safe in terms of preserving data ...

Jane Holland

*

Why buy them, to preserve them? Better
to let cyber-space have them, let them be words
on screen, seen and unseen, corruptible.
That page will fade, data disappear, no safer there
than between hard covers,
yet never so beautiful nor dangerous, something real
to hand on, like a name or a sword. 

Say that under our fingers, our eyes
or here on the tongue, a book of light is rising: 
the word that we made to be heard – dignified 
godhead, salt-washed, 
bound bone and blood in it, 
went to the stake for it, then lost or discarded – 
has been hidden from fire, riddled 
with worms, pressed and spotted 
by browned wild flowers,
over-written by notes scribbled 
in margins, recipes 
laid down on blank versos and these ghosts
on the flyleaf, the dates and names 
of the faithful – when bought, when handed on, 
where kept, by whom (though rarely why,
the hidden purposes of readers 
blown like dust from gilt-edged spines). 

Or rather say, look, this is what we achieved 
in our age. This is a book. 
Open it to the first page and read.

FROM: Books at Auction, &quot;BOUDICCA &amp; CO&quot; (Salt Publishing, 2006)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following extract from &#8216;books at Auction&#8217; probably won&#8217;t come out with the correct line-breaks, but it&#8217;s part of a long poem I wrote about the survival of the book. Personally I think the book WILL survive in its current form, if only because so many people are ardent fans of the book and specialist collectors of the same. Also, technology is not stable enough at the moment to make a complete transfer to that medium safe in terms of preserving data &#8230;</p>
<p>Jane Holland</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Why buy them, to preserve them? Better<br />
to let cyber-space have them, let them be words<br />
on screen, seen and unseen, corruptible.<br />
That page will fade, data disappear, no safer there<br />
than between hard covers,<br />
yet never so beautiful nor dangerous, something real<br />
to hand on, like a name or a sword. </p>
<p>Say that under our fingers, our eyes<br />
or here on the tongue, a book of light is rising:<br />
the word that we made to be heard – dignified<br />
godhead, salt-washed,<br />
bound bone and blood in it,<br />
went to the stake for it, then lost or discarded –<br />
has been hidden from fire, riddled<br />
with worms, pressed and spotted<br />
by browned wild flowers,<br />
over-written by notes scribbled<br />
in margins, recipes<br />
laid down on blank versos and these ghosts<br />
on the flyleaf, the dates and names<br />
of the faithful – when bought, when handed on,<br />
where kept, by whom (though rarely why,<br />
the hidden purposes of readers<br />
blown like dust from gilt-edged spines). </p>
<p>Or rather say, look, this is what we achieved<br />
in our age. This is a book.<br />
Open it to the first page and read.</p>
<p>FROM: Books at Auction, &#8220;BOUDICCA &amp; CO&#8221; (Salt Publishing, 2006)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danuta Kean</title>
		<link>http://www.danutakean.com/blog/the-future-of-reading/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Danuta Kean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danutakean.com/blog/?p=233#comment-321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, you are right, one shouldn&#039;t generalise, but I had already set up an interweb site for my old magazine by then - in 1995.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are right, one shouldn&#8217;t generalise, but I had already set up an interweb site for my old magazine by then &#8211; in 1995&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm on the Net</title>
		<link>http://www.danutakean.com/blog/the-future-of-reading/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm on the Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danutakean.com/blog/?p=233#comment-320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t entirely agree with &quot;the early adopters of new technology are always the young. &quot;

When, in 1997, I wrote to Louis Baum, then editor of The Bookseller, suggesting a website review column, I was 68.

I&#039;m now almost 78 and still leap out of bed at 5.45 a.m. to spend a couple of hours online before breakfast.

Dangerous to generalise!

Anne
http://bookwormonthenet.blogspot.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t entirely agree with &#8220;the early adopters of new technology are always the young. &#8221;</p>
<p>When, in 1997, I wrote to Louis Baum, then editor of The Bookseller, suggesting a website review column, I was 68.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now almost 78 and still leap out of bed at 5.45 a.m. to spend a couple of hours online before breakfast.</p>
<p>Dangerous to generalise!</p>
<p>Anne<br />
<a href="http://bookwormonthenet.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://bookwormonthenet.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Mummy</title>
		<link>http://www.danutakean.com/blog/the-future-of-reading/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Mummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danutakean.com/blog/?p=233#comment-319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is a fascinating debate, but I agree with you that fashion will lead the way (however dispiriting that might seem). As you say, the early adopters of new technology are always the young. Older people might not prefer their books in e-form, it doesn&#039;t mean that their ideas will hold sway in the future. Claiming to follow a literary heritage is surely doomed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a fascinating debate, but I agree with you that fashion will lead the way (however dispiriting that might seem). As you say, the early adopters of new technology are always the young. Older people might not prefer their books in e-form, it doesn&#8217;t mean that their ideas will hold sway in the future. Claiming to follow a literary heritage is surely doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
